Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30201007›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2018

The satisfaction regarding handovers between ambulance and emergency department nurses: an observational study.

Gijs Thomas Hovenkamp, Tycho Joan Olgers, Remco Robert Wortel, Milou Esmée Noltes, Bert Dercksen, Jan Cornelis Ter Maaten

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. [Handover protocols in the emergency department].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Variables required for the audit of quality completion of patient report forms by EMS-A scoping review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gijs Thomas HovenkampDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tycho Joan OlgersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. t.j.olgers@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5119-5245
Remco Robert WortelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Milou Esmée NoltesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bert DercksenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Cornelis Ter MaatenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA thorough handover in the emergency department (ED) is of great importance for improving the quality and safety in the chain of care. The satisfaction of handover may reflect the quality of handover. Research to discover the variables influencing the satisfaction of handovers is scarce. The goal of this study was to determine the factors influencing the satisfaction regarding handovers from ambulance and ED nurses.

methodsWe performed a prospective observational study in the University Medical Center of Groningen. Data regarding prehospital-hospital handovers has been collected by observing handovers and assessing patient chart information. Data regarding the satisfaction has been collected with a questionnaire including a 5-point scale for the level of satisfaction.

resultsIn total, 97 handovers were observed and 97 ambulance nurses and 89 ED nurses completed the questionnaire. The satisfaction of ambulance nurses showed a negative correlation with the waiting time prior to handover (r = -.287, p = .004) and a positive correlation with the presence of a physician in the receiving team (r = .224, p = .028). The satisfaction of ED nurses showed a positive correlation with the use of the ABCDE (r = .288, p = .006) and AMPLE instrument (r = .208, p = .050).

conclusionThe satisfaction of ambulance and ED nurses as sender or receiver of the handover is determined by different factors. The satisfaction of ambulance nurses is mainly affected by the waiting time and presence of a physician, while the satisfaction of ED nurses is affected by the use of handover instruments and the completeness of medical information.

Indexed as

AmbulancesAttitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalJob SatisfactionNursing Staff, HospitalPatient HandoffAdultAgedCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAcute careAmbulance nurseED nurseEmergency departmentHandoffHandoverSatisfactionTransfer

Identifiers

PMID30201007
PMCPMC6131795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.