Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200971›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Quality of life of parents of very preterm infants 4 months after birth: a mixed methods study.

Mariana Amorim, Elisabete Alves, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Ana Isabel Ribeiro, Susana Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. More than meets the eye: The hidden burden of temporary feeding tubes on children and their families.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana AmorimEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal. mariana.amorim@ispup.up.pt.
Elisabete AlvesEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Michelle Kelly-IrvingINSERM UMR1027, F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Ana Isabel RibeiroEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Susana SilvaEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, n° 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

FCT; FEDER; COMPETE; POPH/FSE FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-019902; Ref. FCT PTDC/CS-ECS/120750/2010FCT; FEDER; COMPETE; POPH/FSE IF/01674/2015FCT; FEDER; COMPETE; POPH/FSE PD/BD/105830/2014FCT; FEDER; COMPETE; POPH/FSE POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006862; Ref. FCT UID/DTP/04750/2013FCT; FEDER; COMPETE; POPH/FSE SFRH/BPD/103562/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge about parental quality of life (QoL) is paramount to family-centred and integrated healthcare on prematurity, but evidence is limited. We aimed to explore mothers' and fathers' perspectives about their QoL 4 months after a very preterm childbirth.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional mixed methods study using a convergent design. Parents of very preterm infants were systematically recruited at all level III neonatal intensive care units in the Northern health region of Portugal for one year. Four months after childbirth, 61 mothers and 56 fathers filled-in the World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF Inventory, and 26 couples were interviewed. Linear regression models were computed to assess the association between participants' characteristics and the QoL. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.

resultsA quantitative analysis revealed that the perception of QoL was not significantly different by gender. QoL scores increased slightly from the environment (Mean (SD): 72.1 (14.2)) to the psychological domains (Mean (SD): 78.7 (14.4)). All scores were influenced by psychological characteristics. Socioeconomic position influenced both parents' perceptions concerning the environment domain, and maternal physical and psychological QoL. Infant-related factors were associated with overall QoL among women and with the physical, psychological, social and environment domains among men. Qualitative findings indicated accommodation mechanisms that intertwine the focus on constraining factors (surveillance, sleep disturbances, non-supportive healthcare policies, hygienization) with facilitating factors (social support, accessibility/quality of healthcare, opportunities for developing parental skills). These processes were anchored in child-centredness and a framework that construct hierarchies of hope and expectations about infant's health and development.

conclusionsTo capture parental QoL using mixed methods raises awareness for developing intersectoral family-centred policies, integrated health services and focused-interventions to decrease the disempowering effects of surveillance and hygienization.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMaleMothersParentsPortugalFamily-integrated careMixed methodsParentsQuality of lifeVery preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID30200971
PMCPMC6131838
OpenAlexW2891785357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.