ArticleBMC ecology2018
Benefits and limitations of three-dimensional printing technology for ecological research.
Article in BMC ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A striking difference: biomechanics of the impaling hunting strategy of a moss mantis.Frontiers in zoology · 2026Article
- The Role of 3D Printing in Endodontic Treatment Planning: A Comprehensive Review.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Predation experiments with 3D-printed lizard models yield limited responses in pheasants.PeerJ · 2025Article
- The lab-field continuum in conservation physiology research: leveraging multiple approaches to inform policy and practice.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- Using Pose Estimation and 3D Rendered Models to Study Leg-Mediated Self-righting by Lanternflies.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024Article
- Let's Print an Ecology in 3D (and 4D).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A fish can change its stripes: investigating the role of body colour and pattern in the bluelined goatfish.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Future Tail Tales: A Forward-Looking, Integrative Perspective on Tail Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2021Review
- Producing three-dimensional printed models of the hepatobiliary system from computed tomography imaging data.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021Article
- Producing 3D printed high-fidelity retroperitoneal models from in vivo patient data: The Oxford Method.Journal of anatomy · 2020Article
- Identification of Factors Affecting Predation Risk for Juvenile Turtles using 3D Printed Models.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEcological research often involves sampling and manipulating non-model organisms that reside in heterogeneous environments. As such, ecologists often adapt techniques and ideas from industry and other scientific fields to design and build equipment, tools, and experimental contraptions custom-made for the ecological systems under study. Three-dimensional (3D) printing provides a way to rapidly produce identical and novel objects that could be used in ecological studies, yet ecologists have been slow to adopt this new technology. Here, we provide ecologists with an introduction to 3D printing.
resultsFirst, we give an overview of the ecological research areas in which 3D printing is predicted to be the most impactful and review current studies that have already used 3D printed objects. We then outline a methodological workflow for integrating 3D printing into an ecological research program and give a detailed example of a successful implementation of our 3D printing workflow for 3D printed models of the brown anole, Anolis sagrei, for a field predation study. After testing two print media in the field, we show that the models printed from the less expensive and more sustainable material (blend of 70% plastic and 30% recycled wood fiber) were just as durable and had equal predator attack rates as the more expensive material (100% virgin plastic).
conclusionsOverall, 3D printing can provide time and cost savings to ecologists, and with recent advances in less toxic, biodegradable, and recyclable print materials, ecologists can choose to minimize social and environmental impacts associated with 3D printing. The main hurdles for implementing 3D printing-availability of resources like printers, scanners, and software, as well as reaching proficiency in using 3D image software-may be easier to overcome at institutions with digital imaging centers run by knowledgeable staff. As with any new technology, the benefits of 3D printing are specific to a particular project, and ecologists must consider the investments of developing usable 3D materials for research versus other methods of generating those materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.