Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200431›Full record

ReviewNutrients2018

Challenges in the Diagnosis of Magnesium Status.

Jayme L Workinger, Robert P Doyle, Jonathan Bortz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06959251 (A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Glycine and Magnesium+Thiamine Supplements, Alone or Combined, Administered for 6 Months to Patients With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06959251 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Glycine and Magnesium+Thiamine Supplements, Alone or Combined, Administered for 6 Months to Patients With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades RespiratoriasRan2025 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsPrimary Ciliary DyskinesiaArmsGlycine, Magnesium+thiamine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Aging Gut-Brain Axis: Effects of Dietary Polyphenols and Metal Exposure.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jayme L WorkingerHuman Nutrition and Pharma, Balchem Corporation, 52 Sunrise Park Road, New Hampton, NY 10958, USA. jworkinger@balchem.com.
Robert P DoyleDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Science and Technology, Syracuse University, 111 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. rpdoyle@syr.edu.
Jonathan BortzHuman Nutrition and Pharma, Balchem Corporation, 52 Sunrise Park Road, New Hampton, NY 10958, USA. jbortz@balchem.com.
Syracuse University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnesium is a critical mineral in the human body and is involved in ~80% of known metabolic functions. It is currently estimated that 60% of adults do not achieve the average dietary intake (ADI) and 45% of Americans are magnesium deficient, a condition associated with disease states like hypertension, diabetes, and neurological disorders, to name a few. Magnesium deficiency can be attributed to common dietary practices, medications, and farming techniques, along with estimates that the mineral content of vegetables has declined by as much as 80⁻90% in the last 100 years. However, despite this mineral's importance, it is poorly understood from several standpoints, not the least of which is its unique mechanism of absorption and sensitive compartmental handling in the body, making the determination of magnesium status difficult. The reliance on several popular sample assays has contributed to a great deal of confusion in the literature. This review will discuss causes of magnesium deficiency, absorption, handling, and compartmentalization in the body, highlighting the challenges this creates in determining magnesium status in both clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentBiomarkersDiet, HealthyGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansMagnesiumMagnesium DeficiencyPredictive Value of TestsRecommended Dietary AllowancesReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTissue DistributionBiomarkersMagnesiummagnesiummagnesium absorptionmagnesium assaysmagnesium deficiencymagnesium samplingmagnesium status

Identifiers

PMID30200431
PMCPMC6163803
OpenAlexW2889114464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.