Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Morphological Type Identification of Self-Incompatibility in

Shan-Ce Niu, Jie Huang, Qing Xu, Pei-Xing Li, Hai-Jun Yang, Yong-Qiang Zhang, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Li-Jun Chen, Yun-Xia Niu, Yi-Bo Luo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Challenges and Perspectives in the Study of Self-Incompatibility in Orchids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Original plant traceability ofRoyal Society open science · 2019
    Article
  16. Pollen Tube and Plant Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shan-Ce NiuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. niushance@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-0217
Jie HuangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. 13530401396@163.com.
Qing XuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. xqing1987@163.com.
Pei-Xing LiShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. lpxcathy@hotmail.com.
Hai-Jun YangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. hjyang@scau.edu.cn.
Yong-Qiang ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. bagoodman@163.com.
Guo-Qiang ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. zhang2384539@163.com.
Li-Jun ChenShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. chenlj@sinicaorchid.org.
Yun-Xia NiuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. niuyx@psych.ac.cn.
Yi-Bo LuoState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China. luoyb@ibcas.ac.cn.
Zhong-Jian LiuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China. liuzj@sinicaorchid.org.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is a type of reproductive barrier within plant species and is one of the mechanisms for the formation and maintenance of the high diversity and adaptation of angiosperm species. Approximately 40% of flowering plants are SI species, while only 10% of orchid species are self-incompatible. Intriguingly, as one of the largest genera in Orchidaceae, 72% of

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDendrobiumFlowersFruitPhenotypePhylogenyPollen TubePollinationSeedsSelf-Incompatibility in Flowering PlantsTime Factorsancestral statuscapsule setDendrobiumpollen tubeself-incompatibility

Identifiers

PMID30200389
PMCPMC6163613
OpenAlexW2889068573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.