Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200360›Full record

ReviewGenes2018

Network-Based Approaches to Explore Complex Biological Systems towards Network Medicine.

Giulia Fiscon, Federica Conte, Lorenzo Farina, Paola Paci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physical Activity Rewires the Human Brain against Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial: Optimization strategies for pain management with neuromodulation.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia FisconInstitute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "Antonio Ruberti", National Research Council, via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Rome, Italy. giulia.fiscon@iasi.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-8203
Federica ConteInstitute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "Antonio Ruberti", National Research Council, via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Rome, Italy. federica.conte@iasi.cnr.it.
Lorenzo FarinaDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering "Antonio Ruberti", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Ariosto 25, 00185 Rome, Italy. farina@diag.uniroma1.it.
Paola PaciInstitute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "Antonio Ruberti", National Research Council, via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Rome, Italy. paola.paci@iasi.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-2047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network medicine relies on different types of networks: from the molecular level of protein⁻protein interactions to gene regulatory network and correlation studies of gene expression. Among network approaches based on the analysis of the topological properties of protein⁻protein interaction (PPI) networks, we discuss the widespread DIAMOnD (disease module detection) algorithm. Starting from the assumption that PPI networks can be viewed as maps where diseases can be identified with localized perturbation within a specific neighborhood (i.e., disease modules), DIAMOnD performs a systematic analysis of the human PPI network to uncover new disease-associated genes by exploiting the connectivity significance instead of connection density. The past few years have witnessed the increasing interest in understanding the molecular mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation with a special emphasis on non-coding RNAs since they are emerging as key regulators of many cellular processes in both physiological and pathological states. Recent findings show that coding genes are not the only targets that microRNAs interact with. In fact, there is a pool of different RNAs-including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) -competing with each other to attract microRNAs for interactions, thus acting as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs). The framework of regulatory networks provides a powerful tool to gather new insights into ceRNA regulatory mechanisms. Here, we describe a data-driven model recently developed to explore the lncRNA-associated ceRNA activity in breast invasive carcinoma. On the other hand, a very promising example of the co-expression network is the one implemented by the software SWIM (switch miner), which combines topological properties of correlation networks with gene expression data in order to identify a small pool of genes-called switch genes-critically associated with drastic changes in cell phenotype. Here, we describe SWIM tool along with its applications to cancer research and compare its predictions with DIAMOnD disease genes.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsceRNAgene co-expression networknetwork medicinePPI networkregulatory network

Identifiers

PMID30200360
PMCPMC6162385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.