Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200315›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Annoyance in Response to Vibrations from Railways.

Laura Maclachlan, Mikael Ögren, Elise van Kempen, Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb, Kerstin Persson Waye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Relationship between Sound and Amenities of Transit-Oriented Developments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura MaclachlanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 414, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden. laura.maclachlan@amm.gu.se.
Mikael ÖgrenDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 414, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden. mikael.ogren@amm.gu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4559-4127
Elise van KempenCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. elise.van.kempen@rivm.nl.
Laith Hussain-AlkhateebDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 414, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden. laith.hussain@gu.se.
Kerstin Persson WayeDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 414, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden. kerstin.persson.waye@amm.gu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3789-4557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rail transport is a key stepping stone in the EU's transport policy and is pinpointed for investment and growth over the coming decades. This expanding infrastructure implies increased exposure to environmental stressors, such as noise and ground-borne vibrations. Little is known about the health impacts of exposure to these vibrations. The aim of this paper is to examine the association between annoyance from rail vibrations and the distance of residential dwelling from the railway. It reports the first results of a large epidemiological study, EpiVib, which was designed to investigate the long-term health effects of exposure to rail vibrations. The first part of this study examines a self-reported questionnaire. In total, 6894 individuals aged between 18 and 80 living within 1 km of a railway in west Sweden participated. Results presented here examine the association between distance to the railway and annoyance from vibrations and are stratified by train type. A positive association between closer distance and increased annoyance is seen. After adjustment for important modifiers, results showed that vibrations from freight trains and maintenance operations are reported to be moderately and highly annoying at distances of up to 400 m from the railway and diesel up to 300 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are significantly annoying up to 200 m from the track. Vibration from freight trains and maintenance operations were considered highly annoying up to 300 m from the track, diesel up to 400 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are not reported to be highly annoying after adjustment. Heavier, slower moving locomotives, in the form of diesel and freight trains, appear to be the source of annoyance at distances further from the railway compared to passenger and fast trains. This has implications in terms of property, transport, and infrastructure planning.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureIrritable MoodRailroadsVibrationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHousingHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenYoung Adultannoyancerailrailway proximitytrainvibration

Identifiers

PMID30200315
PMCPMC6163999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.