Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200247›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Population-Based Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Role of Healthcare Services in Place of Death.

Wei Gao, Sumaya Huque, Myfanwy Morgan, Irene J Higginson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Illnesses and Symptoms in Older Adults at the End of Life at Different Places of Death in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei GaoCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK. wei.gao@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-3415
Sumaya HuqueCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK. Sumaya.huque@gmail.com.
Myfanwy MorganInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London SE1 9NH, UK. Myfanwy.morgan@kcl.ac.uk.
Irene J HigginsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK. Irene.higginson@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/19/22National Institute for Health Research 14/19/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a significant geographical disparity in place of death. Socio-demographic and disease-related variables only explain less than a quarter of the variation. Healthcare service factors may account for some (or much) of the remaining variation but their effects have never been systematically evaluated, partly due to the lack of a conceptual framework. This study aims to propose a population-based framework to guide the evaluation of the role of the healthcare service factors in place of death.

methodsReview and synthesis of health service models that include the impact of a service component on either place of death/end of life care outcomes or service access/utilization.

resultsThe framework conceptualizes the impact of healthcare services on the place of death as starting from the end of life care policies that in turn influence service commissioning and shape healthcare service characteristics, including service type, service capacity-facilities, service location, and workforce, through which service utilization and ultimately place of death are affected. Patient socio-demographics, disease-related variables, family and community support and social care also influence place of death, but they are not the focus of this framework and therefore are grouped as needs and other environmental factors. Information on service utilization, together with the place of death, creates loop feedback to inform policy and service commission.

conclusionsThe framework provides guidance for analysis aiming to understand the role of healthcare services in place of death. It aids the interpretation of results in the light of existing knowledge and potentially identifies service factors that can be addressed to improve end of life care.

Indexed as

conceptual frameworkdeterminantsend of life care outcomeend of life care policies and commissioninghealthcare servicesplace of death

Identifiers

PMID30200247
PMCPMC6164352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.