Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30200194›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

Assessing Animal Welfare in Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Other Facilities. A Pilot Study Involving Giraffes.

Simona Normando, Ilaria Pollastri, Daniela Florio, Linda Ferrante, Elisabetta Macchi, Valentina Isaja, Barbara de Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simona NormandoDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. simona.normando@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3978-1487
Ilaria PollastriDepartment of Veterinary Science, Università degli Studi di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy. ilariapollastri@gmail.com.
Daniela FlorioDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40126 Bologna, Italy. daniela.florio@unibo.it.
Linda FerranteDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. linda.ferrante@phd.unipd.it.
Elisabetta MacchiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40126 Bologna, Italy. elisabetta.macchi@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-1668
Valentina IsajaZoom Turin, Strada Piscina 36, 10040 Cumiana, Italy. valentina.isaja@zoomtorino.it.
Barbara de MoriDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. barbara.demori@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, awareness of the controversial aspects connected with wild animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) in zoos and other facilities has increased due to cultural changes. Therefore, the need to apply transparent procedures to evaluate AVIs programs in zoos and similar facilities has also increased. This study presents results of animal welfare's assessment of a pilot test of a protocol based on six steps that aim to explore and assess the overall value of AVIs considering the impact both on animals and visitors. In the present paper, we discuss the multifaceted approach to animal welfare assessment during animal-visitor interactions, combining quantitative behavioural observations/analysis and a welfare risk-assessment procedure, which forms the basis of the six-step protocol. Pilot testing of said approach to animal welfare assessment involved giraffes (

Indexed as

animal-visitor interactiongirafferisk assessmentwelfarezoo

Identifiers

PMID30200194
PMCPMC6162555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.