SynthesisMedicine2018
Effects of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy on survival of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Different Modalities of Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Pooled it
- REDISCOVER guidelines for borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: management algorithm, unanswered questions, and future perspectives.Updates in surgery · 2024Guideline
- Survival benefit of particle chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Current and emerging therapeutic strategies in pancreatic cancer: Challenges and opportunities.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Low Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Good Prognosis in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Novel strategies using modern radiotherapy to improve pancreatic cancer outcomes: toward a new standard?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
- An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To comparatively evaluate chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) by meta-analysis.A literature search was performed until August 2016 to identify comparative studies assessing survival rates and complications. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined with the fixed or random effects model.Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the defined inclusion criteria. A total of 593 patients were included, with 295 and 298 treated with CRT and CT, respectively. Overall survival showed no statistically significant difference in patients treated with CRT and CT at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (respectively: OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.60-2.17; OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.53-2.52; OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.43-2.95; OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.67-1.72). Meanwhile, CRT had higher rates of grade 3 to 4 adverse events (nausea and vomiting, OR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.36-5.52; diarrhea, OR = 4.28, 95% CI: 1.16-15.71).The data are not sufficient to change from CT to CRT in the treatment of patients with LAPC and thus clinical discretion is required until more data is accumulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.