ArticleMedicine2018
STROBE-A preliminary investigation of IVIM-DWI in cardiac imaging.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Integrated Slice-specific Shimming for old myocardial infarction: A Pilot Study.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- The Value of the Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Technique in Evaluating Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Motion-Induced Signal Loss in In Vivo Cardiac Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the possibility to apply intravoxel incoherent motion-magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI) in cardiac imaging.Multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence scanning was performed on 12 healthy volunteers. A double exponential model was adopted, and the b-value sequence was 0, 20, 60, 80, 120, 200, and 600 second/mm. The D-value, D*-value, and f-value of the anterior posterior and lateral walls of the ventricular septum were respectively measured on the short axis section of the heart, the parameters of the myocardium in different blood supply areas in each segment were recorded, and the measured data of these different segments were compared using analysis of variance.Among these 12 healthy volunteers, the D-value, D*-value, and f-value of these 72 segments were not exactly equal, the D-values of the myocardium in the 5th and 11th segment were lower than those in the 2nd, 3rd, 8th, and 9th segments, and the pairwise differences were statistically significant (P < .001). Furthermore, the difference in D-value between the 5th and 11th segments was not statistically significant (P = 1.000). The D*-value and f-value of the myocardium in the 5th and 11th segment were higher than those in the 2nd, 3rd, 8th, and 9th segments, and the pairwise differences were statistically significant (P < .001). Furthermore, the differences in D*-value and f-value between the 5th and 11th segments was not statistically significant (P = .214, .787).The intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) technique can quantitatively reflect the diffusion and blood perfusion status of the myocardium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.