Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30199597›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2019

Physicochemical and biological properties of novel chlorhexidine-loaded nanotube-modified dentin adhesive.

Sabrina A Feitosa, Jadesada Palasuk, Saulo Geraldeli, Lester Jack Windsor, Marco C Bottino

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chlorhexidine-modified nanotubes and their effects on the polymerization and bonding performance of a dental adhesive.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina A FeitosaDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, 46202, Indiana.
Jadesada PalasukDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand.
Saulo GeraldeliRestorative Dental Sciences, Operative Division, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610, Florida.
Lester Jack WindsorDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, 46202, Indiana.
Marco C BottinoDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, 48109, Michigan.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNaresuan University · THUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

A Novel Multilayered Membrane for Periodontal RegenerationK08DE023552 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOTTINO, MARCO C · 2013 to 2017
$716k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE023552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A commercially available three-step (etch-and-rinse) adhesive was modified by adding chlorhexidine (CHX)-loaded nanotubes (Halloysite®, HNT) at two concentrations (CHX10% and CHX20%). The experimental groups were: SBMP (unmodified adhesive, control), HNT (SBMP modified with HNT), CHX10 (SBMP modified with HNT loaded with CHX10%), and CHX20 (SBMP modified with HNT loaded with CHX20%). Changes in the degree of conversion (DC%), Knoop hardness (KHN), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity, and anti-matrix metalloproteinase [MMP-1] activity (collagenase-I) were evaluated. In regards to DC%, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test revealed that only the factor "adhesive" was statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences were detected in DC% when 20 s light-curing was used (p > 0.05). For Knoop microhardness, one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test showed statistically significant differences when comparing HNT (20.82 ± 1.65) and CHX20% (21.71 ± 2.83) with the SBMP and CHX10% groups. All adhesives presented similar WS and cytocompatibility. The CHX-loaded nanotube-modified adhesive released enough CHX to inhibit the growth of S. mutans and L. casei. Adhesive eluates were not able to effectively inhibit MMP-1 activity. The evaluation of higher CHX concentrations might be necessary to provide an effective and predictable MMP inhibition. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res B Part B, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 868-875, 2019.

Indexed as

ChlorhexidineDentin-Bonding AgentsMaterials TestingDental PulpHumansLacticaseibacillus caseiNanotubesStem CellsStreptococcus mutansChlorhexidineDentin-Bonding Agentsadhesivechlorhexidinedentinhalloysitematrix metalloproteinasenanotubes

Identifiers

PMID30199597
PMCPMC6408277
OpenAlexW2892363155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.