Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30199525›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Assessment of mutation probabilities of KRAS G12 missense mutants and their long-timescale dynamics by atomistic molecular simulations and Markov state modeling.

Tatu Pantsar, Sami Rissanen, Daniel Dauch, Tuomo Laitinen, Ilpo Vattulainen, Antti Poso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Distinct Molecular and Clinical Features of Specific Variants of KRAS Codon 12 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural Dynamics of Rho GTPases.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Decrypting Allostery in Membrane-Bound K-Ras4B Using ComplementaryJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatu PantsarSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-2909
Sami RissanenLaboratory of Physics, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Daniel DauchDepartment of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tuomo LaitinenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ilpo VattulainenLaboratory of Physics, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7408-3214
Antti PosoSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-4204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mutated KRAS protein is frequently observed in human cancers. Traditionally, the oncogenic properties of KRAS missense mutants at position 12 (G12X) have been considered as equal. Here, by assessing the probabilities of occurrence of all KRAS G12X mutations and KRAS dynamics we show that this assumption does not hold true. Instead, our findings revealed an outstanding mutational bias. We conducted a thorough mutational analysis of KRAS G12X mutations and assessed to what extent the observed mutation frequencies follow a random distribution. Unique tissue-specific frequencies are displayed with specific mutations, especially with G12R, which cannot be explained by random probabilities. To clarify the underlying causes for the nonrandom probabilities, we conducted extensive atomistic molecular dynamics simulations (170 μs) to study the differences of G12X mutations on a molecular level. The simulations revealed an allosteric hydrophobic signaling network in KRAS, and that protein dynamics is altered among the G12X mutants and as such differs from the wild-type and is mutation-specific. The shift in long-timescale conformational dynamics was confirmed with Markov state modeling. A G12X mutation was found to modify KRAS dynamics in an allosteric way, which is especially manifested in the switch regions that are responsible for the effector protein binding. The findings provide a basis to understand better the oncogenic properties of KRAS G12X mutants and the consequences of the observed nonrandom frequencies of specific G12X mutations.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutation, MissenseDNA Mutational AnalysisGuanosine DiphosphateGuanosine TriphosphateHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLigandsMarkov ChainsMolecular ConformationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationNeoplasmsPrincipal Component AnalysisProbabilityProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Guanosine DiphosphateGuanosine TriphosphateKRAS protein, humanLigandsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID30199525
PMCPMC6147662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.