Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30199076›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Mood variations decoded from multi-site intracranial human brain activity.

Omid G Sani, Yuxiao Yang, Morgan B Lee, Heather E Dawes, Edward F Chang, Maryam M Shanechi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04958096 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Adjunct Cortical Stimulation With Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) to Treat Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndrew Moses Lee, MD, PhDRan2021 to 2026Enrolled15ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive DisorderArmsStandard Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation, Cortical Stimulation for PFC, Cortical Stimulation for ACC
NCT05327387 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Model-based Electrical Brain Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsMedication Refractory Epilepsy Patients With Electrodes Already Implanted Based on Clinical Criteria for Standard MonitoringArmsmodel-based electrical brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Increased Aperiodic Exponents Track Depression Symptom Severity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Scalp EEG predicts intracranial brain activity in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Intracranial substrates of meditation-induced neuromodulation in the amygdala and hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid G SaniMing Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-5669
Yuxiao YangMing Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-7956
Morgan B LeeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-0109
Heather E DawesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Maryam M ShanechiMing Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0544-7720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to decode mood state over time from neural activity could enable closed-loop systems to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. However, this decoding has not been demonstrated, partly owing to the difficulty of modeling distributed mood-relevant neural dynamics while dealing with the sparsity of mood state measurements. Here we develop a modeling framework to decode mood state variations from multi-site intracranial recordings in seven human subjects with epilepsy who self-reported their mood state intermittently over multiple days. We built dynamic neural encoding models of mood state and corresponding decoders for each individual and demonstrated that mood state variations over time can be decoded from neural activity. Across subjects, the decoders largely recruited neural signals from limbic regions, whose spectro-spatial features were tuned to mood variations. The dynamic models also provided an analytical tool to compute the timescales of the decoded mood state. These results provide an initial line of evidence indicating the feasibility of mood state decoding.

Indexed as

AffectAgedBrainBrain MappingEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalModels, NeurologicalMonitoring, PhysiologicSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30199076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.