Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30199033›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018

Three-Dimensional Ultrasonic Needle Tip Tracking with a Fiber-Optic Ultrasound Receiver.

Wenfeng Xia, Simeon J West, Malcolm C Finlay, Rosalind Pratt, Sunish Mathews, Jean-Martial Mari, Sebastien Ourselin, Anna L David, Adrien E Desjardins

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenfeng XiaWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; wenfeng.xia@ucl.ac.uk.
Simeon J WestDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital.
Malcolm C FinlayDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; St Bartholomew's Hospital and Queen Mary University of London.
Rosalind PrattInstitute for Women's Health, University College London; Centre for Medical Imaging Computing, University College London.
Sunish MathewsWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London.
Jean-Martial MariGePaSud, University of French Polynesia.
Sebastien OurselinWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Centre for Medical Imaging Computing, University College London.
Anna L DavidWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London; Institute for Women's Health, University College London; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit); NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
Adrien E DesjardinsWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London.
University College London · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of French Polynesia · PF

Funding

European Research Council 310970Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203145Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT101957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is frequently used for guiding minimally invasive procedures, but visualizing medical devices is often challenging with this imaging modality. When visualization is lost, the medical device can cause trauma to critical tissue structures. Here, a method to track the needle tip during ultrasound image-guided procedures is presented. This method involves the use of a fiber-optic ultrasound receiver that is affixed within the cannula of a medical needle to communicate ultrasonically with the external ultrasound probe. This custom probe comprises a central transducer element array and side element arrays. In addition to conventional two-dimensional (2D) B-mode ultrasound imaging provided by the central array, three-dimensional (3D) needle tip tracking is provided by the side arrays. For B-mode ultrasound imaging, a standard transmit-receive sequence with electronic beamforming is performed. For ultrasonic tracking, Golay-coded ultrasound transmissions from the 4 side arrays are received by the hydrophone sensor, and subsequently the received signals are decoded to identify the needle tip's spatial location with respect to the ultrasound imaging probe. As a preliminary validation of this method, insertions of the needle/hydrophone pair were performed in clinically realistic contexts. This novel ultrasound imaging/tracking method is compatible with current clinical workflow, and it provides reliable device tracking during in-plane and out-of-plane needle insertions.

Indexed as

NeedlesOptical FibersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTransducersUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30199033
PMCPMC6231697
OpenAlexW2888391451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.