Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30199016›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants.

Hantao Zhao, Tyler Thrash, Stefan Wehrli, Christoph Hölscher, Mubbasir Kapadia, Jascha Grübel, Raphael P Weibel, Victor R Schinazi

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hantao ZhaoChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich; hantao.zhao@gess.ethz.ch.
Tyler ThrashChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich; Digital Society Initiative, University of Zürich; Department of Geography, University of Zürich.
Stefan WehrliDecision Science Laboratory, ETH Zürich.
Christoph HölscherChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich.
Mubbasir KapadiaComputer Science Department, Rutgers University.
Jascha GrübelChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich.
Raphael P WeibelChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich.
Victor R SchinaziChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the interactions among multiple participants is a challenge for researchers from various disciplines, including the decision sciences and spatial cognition. With a local area network and dedicated software platform, experimenters can efficiently monitor the behavior of the participants that are simultaneously immersed in a desktop virtual environment and digitalize the collected data. These capabilities allow for experimental designs in spatial cognition and navigation research that would be difficult (if not impossible) to conduct in the real world. Possible experimental variations include stress during an evacuation, cooperative and competitive search tasks, and other contextual factors that may influence emergent crowd behavior. However, such a laboratory requires maintenance and strict protocols for data collection in a controlled setting. While the external validity of laboratory studies with human participants is sometimes questioned, a number of recent papers suggest that the correspondence between real and virtual environments may be sufficient for studying social behavior in terms of trajectories, hesitations, and spatial decisions. In this article, we describe a method for conducting experiments on decision-making and navigation with up to 36 participants in a networked desktop virtual reality setup (i.e., the Decision Science Laboratory or DeSciL). This experiment protocol can be adapted and applied by other researchers in order to set up a networked desktop virtual reality laboratory.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksDecision MakingSpatial BehaviorVirtual RealityCognitionHumansSoftwareUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID30199016
PMCPMC6231909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.