ArticleActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2018
Ab initio structure solution of a proteolytic fragment using ARCIMBOLDO.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Introduction to molecular replacement: a time perspective.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Crystal structure determination requires solving the phase problem. This can be accomplished using ab initio direct methods for small molecules and macromolecules at resolutions higher than 1.2 Å, whereas macromolecular structure determination at lower resolution requires either molecular replacement using a homologous structure or experimental phases using a derivative such as covalent labeling (for example selenomethionine or mercury derivatization) or heavy-atom soaking (for example iodide ions). Here, a case is presented in which crystals were obtained from a 30.8 kDa protein sample and yielded a 1.6 Å resolution data set with a unit cell that could accommodate approximately 8 kDa of protein. Thus, it was unclear what had been crystallized. Molecular replacement with pieces of homologous proteins and attempts at iodide ion soaking failed to yield a solution. The crystals could not be reproduced. Sequence-independent molecular replacement using the structures available in the Protein Data Bank also failed to yield a solution. Ultimately, ab initio structure solution proved successful using the program ARCIMBOLDO, which identified two α-helical elements and yielded interpretable maps. The structure was the C-terminal dimerization domain of the intended target from Mycobacterium smegmatis. This structure is presented as a user-friendly test case in which an unknown protein fragment could be determined using ARCIMBOLDO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.