Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30198595›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for mefloquine and its application alongside a clinical effectiveness model to select an optimal dose for prevention of malaria in young Caucasian children.

Trevor N Johnson, Yumi Cleary, Neil Parrott, Bruno Reigner, James R Smith, Stephen Toovey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A comparison of different methods for the first-in-pediatric dose selection.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Trevor N JohnsonCertara UK Limited (Simcyp) Level 2-Acero, 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield, UK.
Yumi ClearyPharma Research & Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Neil ParrottPharma Research & Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Bruno ReignerPharma Research & Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
James R SmithPharma Research & Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephen TooveyPegasus Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-5785
Roche (Switzerland) · CHAssociation for Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension · CHSimcyp (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo predict the optimal chemoprophylactic dose of mefloquine in infants of 5-10 kg using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and clinical effectiveness models.

methodsThe PBPK model was developed in Simcyp version 14.1 and verified against clinical pharmacokinetic data in adults; the final model, accounting for developmental physiology and enzyme ontogeny was then applied in the paediatric population. The clinical effectiveness model utilized real-world chemoprophylaxis data with stratification of output by age and including infant data from the UK population.

resultsPBPK simulations in infant populations depend on the assumed fraction of mefloquine metabolized by CYP3A4 (0.47, 0.95) and on the associated CYP3A4 ontogeny (Salem, Upreti). However, all scenarios suggest that a dose of 62.5 mg weekly achieves or exceeds the exposure in adults following a 250 mg weekly dose and results in a minimum plasma concentration of 620 ng ml

conclusionsThe PBPK and clinical effectiveness models are mutually supportive and suggest a prophylactic dose of 62.5 mg weekly in the Caucasian 5-10 kg infant population travelling to endemic countries. This dual approach offers a novel route to dose selection in a vulnerable population, where clinical trials would be difficult to conduct.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAge FactorsAntimalarialsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansInfantKetoconazoleMalariaMefloquineMiddle AgedRifampinAntimalarialsKetoconazoleMefloquineRifampinchildreninfectious diseasespaediatricspharmacodynamicsphysiologically based pharmacokinetictropical diseases

Identifiers

PMID30198595
PMCPMC6303238
OpenAlexW2899558651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.