Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30198418›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2019

Ubiquitin-Proteasome Axis, Especially Ubiquitin-Specific Protease-17 (

Nuri Yildirim, Gizem Calibasi Kocal, Zerrin Isik, Bahadır Saatli, Ugur Saygili, Tugba Uysal, Cagnur Ulukus, Meral Koyuncuoglu, Hulya Ellidokuz, Yasemin Basbinar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tumor SuppressorFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nuri YildirimDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University and Department of Basic Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University. Ege Üniversitesi Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum AD, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. nuri-yildirim@hotmail.com.
Gizem Calibasi KocalBasic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Zerrin IsikFaculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Bahadır SaatliFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ugur SaygiliFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Tugba UysalBasic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Cagnur UlukusFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Meral KoyuncuogluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Hulya EllidokuzDepartment of Preventive Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Yasemin BasbinarBasic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Dokuz Eylül University · TREge University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate gene expression differences and related functions between primary tumor, malignant cells in ascites, and metastatic peritoneal implant in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

methodsBiopsies from primary tumor, peritoneal implant, and ascites were collected from 10 patients operated primarily for high-grade, advanced-staged serous ovarian cancer. Total RNA isolation was performed from collected tissue biopsy and fluid samples, and RNA expression profile was measured. Messenger RNA expression profiles of 3 different groups were compared. Functional analyses of candidate genes were carried out by gene ontology and pathway analysis.

resultsThere were significant differences in the expression of 5 genes between primary tumor and peritoneal implant, 979 genes between primary tumor and malignant cells in ascites, and 649 genes between peritoneal implant and malignant cells in ascites. Three commonly enriched gene ontology functions between "primary tumor and malignant cells in the ascites" and "peritoneal implant and malignant cells in the ascites" were protein deubiquitination, ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism, and apoptotic processes. All genes related to these functions belonged to

conclusionGene expression difference between primary tumor and the peritoneal implant is not as much as the difference between primary tumor and free cells in the ascites. These results show that malignant cells in the ascites return into its genetic origin after they invade on the peritoneum. Significantly increased expression of DUB-enzyme genes,

Indexed as

AdultAscitesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndopeptidasesEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsRNA, MessengerUbiquitinUbiquitin-Specific ProteasesEndopeptidasesRNA, MessengerUbiquitinUbiquitin-Specific ProteasesUSP17L2 protein, humandeubiquitinationepithelial–mesenchymal transitionmicroarrayovarian cancerserousubiquitin–proteasome pathway

Identifiers

PMID30198418
OpenAlexW2890406560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.