Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30198321›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

Risk Assessment in Chinese Hospitalized Patients Comparing the Padua and Caprini Scoring Algorithms.

Xiaolan Chen, Lei Pan, Hui Deng, Jingyuan Zhang, Xinjie Tong, He Huang, Min Zhang, Jianlin He, Joseph A Caprini, Yong Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of venous thromboembolism risk categories derived from Caprini score.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Chinese Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
  19. Clinical Validation of the Chinese Version of Patient Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Form.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaolan ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lei PanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hui DengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jingyuan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinjie TongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
He HuangDepartment of Hospital Affairs, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Min ZhangDepartment of Hospital Affairs, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianlin HeEpigenomics and Computational Biology Lab, Biocomplexity Institute of Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Joseph A CapriniUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago IL, USA.
Yong WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Beijing Shijitan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNBiocom · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current venous thromboembolism (VTE) guidelines recommend all patients to be assessed for the risk of VTE using risk assessment models (RAMs). The study was to evaluate the performance of the Caprini and Padua RAMs among Chinese hospitalized patients. We reviewed data from 189 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 201 non-DVT patients. Deep venous thrombosis risk factors were obtained from all patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the Caprini and Padua scores for all patients were calculated. The receiver operating curve (ROC) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of each score. We documented that age, acute infection, prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, blood platelets, and anticoagulation were significantly associated with the occurrence of DVT (

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAsian PeopleModels, CardiovascularSeverity of Illness IndexVenous ThrombosisAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBlood SedimentationChinaFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DCapriniChinese hospitalized patientscomparisonPadua

Identifiers

PMID30198321
PMCPMC6714840
OpenAlexW2891196294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.