Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30198315›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

Comparative Pharmacokinetic Profile of 3 Batches of Ovine Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and 1 Batch of Branded Enoxaparin.

Walter Jeske, Ahmed Kouta, Rick Duff, Varun Rangnekar, Manoj Niverthi, Debra Hoppensteadt, Jawed Fareed, Yiming Yao

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Walter JeskeCardiovascular Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, Maywood, IL, USA.
Ahmed KoutaCardiovascular Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, Maywood, IL, USA.
Rick DuffCardiovascular Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, Maywood, IL, USA.
Varun RangnekarGeorgia Thrombosis Forum, Suwanee, Georgia, USA.
Manoj NiverthiGeorgia Thrombosis Forum, Suwanee, Georgia, USA.
Debra HoppensteadtCardiovascular Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, Maywood, IL, USA.
Jawed FareedCardiovascular Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, Maywood, IL, USA.
Yiming YaoSuzhou Ronnsi Pharma, Suzhou, China.
Loyola University Chicago · USThe Thousand · USSuzhou Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pharmaceutical grade heparin is obtained almost exclusively from porcine intestinal mucosa, there is interest in diversifying heparin sourcing to address potential supply shortages and economically motivated adulteration. Since ovine-derived heparin is structurally similar to porcine heparin, it is expected that ovine-derived low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) will be comparable to porcine-derived LMWH. This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of 3 batches of ovine LMWH with that of enoxaparin in nonhuman primates. Blood samples were collected prior to and at 2, 4, and 6 hours post-administration of a 1 mg/kg subcutaneous dose of LMWH. Circulating drug concentrations determined using anti-Xa and anti-thrombin assays were used to calculate values for PK parameters. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The ovine LMWHs tested met pharmacopoeial potency and molecular weight distribution requirements for enoxaparin. In the post-administration samples, comparable levels of branded enoxaparin and ovine enoxaparin were observed using anti-Xa and anti-thrombin assays, with the concentration versus time curves being nearly superimposable. Consistent with this similarity, no significant differences were observed between PK parameters calculated for branded enoxaparin and ovine LMWH. The TFPI levels returned to baseline levels by 6 hours in ovine LMWH-treated animals but remained slightly elevated in animals treated with branded enoxaparin. It is concluded that the pharmacokinetics of ovine enoxaparin were not only comparable between different batches but also similar to the branded product. Thus, LMWH prepared from ovine mucosal heparin is comparable to its porcine-derived counterpart.

Indexed as

EnoxaparinFactor Xa InhibitorsAnimalsFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleSheepSwineEnoxaparinFactor Xa Inhibitorslow-molecular-weight heparinovinepharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID30198315
PMCPMC6714839
OpenAlexW2889616344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.