ArticleEC orthopaedics2018
Distraction Implantation. A New Technique in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Direct Skeletal Attachment.
Article in EC orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsing the marrow canal of a tubular bone as a holding compartment for implant stems has been the paradigm in total joint arthroplasty for more than a century, and for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses for about forty years. Both interventions rely on the osteogenesis in the inner walls of the marrow canal in a direction radially inwards. It so remains despite the frequent aseptic loosening of the implant stems caused by the resorption of the marrow canal's inner walls which increases the canal's diameter and reduces its capacity to hold the implant. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo improve the bone-device bond, we suggest an implantation methodology that activates positive osteogenic remodeling in the circular direction rather than radially inwards. The rationale is that circular osteogenesis is a component of natural healing of bone fractures and its activating may mitigate the consequences of resorption caused by stress shielding, bone developmental growth and other factors.
resultsCircular osteogenesis occurs in response to the distraction of slots precut into the bone tube. We call this methodology distraction implantation (DI) because of its debt to Ilizarov type distraction osteogenesis (DO). The methodology is accompanied by a design of an implant stem, and has been investigated in a previous pilot animal study.
conclusionDistraction implantation is based on a component of natural healing of bone fractures and therefore has merit to be investigated further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30198026PMC6124505W2986636259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.