Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197933›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2018

Recruiting young pre-symptomatic children for a clinical trial in type 1 diabetes: Insights from the Fr1da insulin intervention study.

Kerstin Kick, Robin Assfalg, Susanne Aydin, Susanne Bechtold-Dalla Pozza, Dominik Böcker, Sonja Braig, Melanie Bunk, Desiree Dunstheimer, Alevtina Durmashkina, Uwe Ermer and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin KickForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Robin AssfalgInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Susanne AydinForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Susanne Bechtold-Dalla PozzaKlinikum der Universität München, Dr. Von Haunersches Kinderspital, Munich, Germany.
Dominik BöckerKlinikum Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Sonja BraigKlinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Melanie BunkForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Desiree DunstheimerKlinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Alevtina DurmashkinaForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Uwe ErmerKliniken St. Elisabeth, Neuburg/Donau, Germany.
Antonia GavazzeniKinderarzt Praxis Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.
Eva-Maria GerstlKlinikum Dritter Orden, Passau, Germany.
Melanie HeinrichForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Melanie HerbstForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Yvonne KriesenForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Ursula Kuhnle-KrahlDiabetes Center Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
Herbert MüllerKlinikum Kempten, Kempten, Germany.
Nicole Nellen-HellmuthFamilienarztpraxis Dr. med. Hans-Jörg Hellmuth & Kollegen, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian OckertRoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany.
Claudia RammingerForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Marina SindichakisKlinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Germany.
Stefanie TretterKlinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany.
Katharina WarnckeForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Peter AchenbachForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Anette-G ZieglerForschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Verena S HoffmannInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEAsklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting · DEBayreuth Medical Center · DEKempten University of Applied Sciences · DEKlinik Donaustauf · DEKlinikum Passau · DEKlinikum Weiden · DEMünchen Klinik · DENuremberg Hospital · DERoMed Kliniken · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough detection of children at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes and diagnosis of early stages is possible, up to now there exists no approved therapy to delay or prevent type 1 diabetes. Thus it is vital to develop evidence-based interventions. For this a sufficient number of trial participants is crucial but difficult to obtain especially in asymptomatic children.

aimIdentifying family characteristics that lead to or impede trial participation and analyze reasons stated by families for non-participation.

methodsParticipants for the Fr1da Insulin Intervention study are recruited from the Fr1da study, a population based screening for early stage type 1 diabetes in Bavaria. Families with eligible children were invited to enroll. We analyzed sex and age of the child, distance of the family to the study center in Munich and the existence of a first degree family member with type 1 as possible influential factors for study participation. We also analyzed reasons stated by families who declined study participation in a phone interview.

resultsOf 146 eligible children 77 (53%) were enrolled into the trial. None of the tested family characteristics differed significantly between the enrolling and the families not participating, but in general enrolling families lived closer to the study site than families not participating. This is also reflected in the reasons given by non-participating families. The most frequent reason stated were time restrictions. The second most frequent reason was the venous blood draw.

conclusionThe factors for non-participation identified in this project need be taken into account for the design of future trials in young children to ensure proper recruitment and thus to generate valid results for medical treatment of children. More research on the reason of participation and non-participation in clinical trials is needed.

Indexed as

AsymptomaticChildrenInfantsTrial enrollmentTrial recruitmentType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30197933
PMCPMC6126533
OpenAlexW2887931029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.