ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018
Measuring Pedestrian Collision Detection With Peripheral Field Loss and the Impact of Peripheral Prisms.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot study of a pedestrian collision detection test for a multisite trial of field expansion devices for hemianopia.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2024Article
- Understanding viewpoint changes in peripheral prisms for field expansion by virtual reality simulation.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Egocentric Boundaries on Distinguishing Colliding and Non-Colliding Pedestrians while Walking in a Virtual Environment.IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging · 2024Article
- The effect of visual rivalry in peripheral head-mounted displays on mobility.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Oblique multi-periscopic prism for field expansion of homonymous hemianopia.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Influence of Systematic Gaze Patterns in Navigation and Search Tasks with Simulated Retinitis Pigmentosa.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- 2017 Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture: Peripheral Prisms for Visual Field Expansion: A Translational Journey.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2020Article
- Multi-periscopic prism device for field expansion.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Field Expansion with Multiplexing Prism Glasses Improves Pedestrian Detection for Acquired Monocular Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Expansion of Peripheral Visual Field with Novel Virtual Reality Digital Spectacles.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Toward Improving the Mobility of Patients with Peripheral Visual Field Defects with Novel Digital Spectacles.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Design of 45° periscopic visual field expansion device for peripheral field loss.Optics communications · 2020Article
- Field Expansion for Acquired Monocular Vision Using a Multiplexing Prism.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018Article
- Development of Virtual Reality Walking Collision Detection Test on Head-mounted display.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
- Binocular see-through configuration and eye movement attenuate visual rivalry in peripheral wearable displays.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
- Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePeripheral field loss (PFL) due to retinitis pigmentosa, choroideremia, or glaucoma often results in a highly constricted residual central field, which makes it difficult for patients to avoid collision with approaching pedestrians. We developed a virtual environment to evaluate the ability of patients to detect pedestrians and judge potential collisions. We validated the system with both PFL patients and normally sighted subjects with simulated PFL. We also tested whether properly placed high-power prisms may improve pedestrian detection.
methodsA virtual park-like open space was rendered using a driving simulator (configured for walking speeds), and pedestrians in testing scenarios appeared within and outside the residual central field. Nine normally sighted subjects and eight PFL patients performed the pedestrian detection and collision judgment tasks. The performance of the subjects with simulated PFL was further evaluated with field of view expanding prisms.
resultsThe virtual system for testing pedestrian detection and collision judgment was validated. The performance of PFL patients and normally sighted subjects with simulated PFL were similar. The prisms for simulated PFL improved detection rates, reduced detection response times, and supported reasonable collision judgments in the prism-expanded field; detections and collision judgments in the residual central field were not influenced negatively by the prisms.
conclusionsThe scenarios in a virtual environment are suitable for evaluating PFL and the impact of field of view expanding devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This study validated an objective means to evaluate field expansion devices in reproducible near-real-life settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.