Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197675›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Selective enrichment of CD133

Ke Lv, Zhenyu Chen, Xiaoqing Zhang, Quanbin Zhang, Ling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ke LvNeurosurgical Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Zhenyu ChenNeuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Xiaoqing ZhangNeuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Quanbin ZhangNeurosurgical Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Ling LiuNeuroregeneration Key Laboratory of Shanghai Universities, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the brain tumors are malignant with an extremely poor survival rate. Recent progress in identifying cancer stem cells (CSCs) within the brain tumors is starting to revolutionize our understanding in the imitation and progression of tumors as well as relapse and the development of therapeutic strategies. Suspension spheroid body culture paradigm is a routine method in enriching CSCs. While, it was reported recently that CSCs within the brain tumor may also be enriched through adherent monolayer culture with optimized properties. In the present study, 18 surgically resected brain tumors were used for analyzing the feasibility of adherent enrichment of CSCs. The results indicated that 50% of glioblastomas were able to generate adherent CSCs, which were uniformly positive for Sox2, CD133, GFAP and Nestin. However, adherent culture paradigm failed to yield CSCs in secondary brain tumors, including neurocytomas, ependymomas, germ cell tumors or low-grade astrocytomas, which is most likely due to a lack of CD133

Indexed as

cancer stem cellsCD133glioblastomaSOX2

Identifiers

PMID30197675
PMCPMC6126346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.