Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197583›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging reviews2018

Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization with Degradable Starch 
Microspheres (DSMs-TACE) of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Antonio Orlacchio, Fabrizio Chegai, Simona Francioso, Stefano Merolla, Serena Monti, Mario Angelico, Giuseppe Tisone, Lorenzo Mannelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Orlacchio1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Fabrizio Chegai1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Simona Francioso1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stefano Merolla1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Serena Monti1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mario Angelico1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Giuseppe Tisone1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lorenzo Mannelli1Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133Rome, Italy; 2Liver Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy; 4Organ Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 5Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Policlinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this study were to: a) evaluate tumor response rates using modified-Response-evaluation-criteria-in-solid-tumors (mRecist) criteria, b) evaluate safety of Degradable Starch Microspheres Trans-arterial-chemo-embolization (DSMs-TACE) for unresectable hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 24 HCC cirrhotic patients (21/3 M/F, mean age 66.3 years) to be treated with repeated DSMs-TACE procedures, performed at 4-6 week intervals on the basis of tumor response and patients tolerance. Clinical and biochemical evaluations were performed before and after each procedure. Treatment response was also assessed by Computed-tomography (CT) or Magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-scan 4-6 weeks following each procedure.

resultsIn our experience, DSMs-TACE was both safe and effective. A total of 53 DSMs-TACE procedures were performed (2.2 per patient). No procedure-related death was observed. Complete Response (CR) was observed in 5/24 (20.8%), 4/17 (23.5%) and 5/12 (41.6%) patients after the first, second and third procedure, respectively. At the end of each treatment, all patients experienced at least a partial response. At the end of the repeated procedures, no differences between mono- or bi-lobar disease were observed in patients with CR (64.2% vs 50%; p=ns). In most cases, treatment discontinuation was due to worsening liver function.

conclusionDSMs-TACE is a valid, well-tolerated alternative treatment to Lipiodol-TACE or DEB-TACE, as it has demonstrated to achieve a relatively high percentage of complete tumor necrosis. CR rates were similar between patients with mono- or bi-lobar disease indicating the possibility of carrying-out repeated procedure in a safe and effective way in both types of patients.

Indexed as

degradable starch microspheresHCC cirrhotic patientsHepatocellular carcinomalocoregional therapiesrecurrence-free survivaltranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID30197583
PMCPMC6110039
OpenAlexW2648321601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.