ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
Interinstitutional patient transfers between rapid chemotherapy cycles were feasible to utilize proton beam therapy for pediatric Ewing sarcoma family of tumors.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging of ewing sarcoma: an updated analysis including presenting features, prognostic imaging biomarkers, and treatment response assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- The OReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022Article
- Paediatric proton therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Advances in Radiation Therapy for Primary Bone Malignancies.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the feasibility of transferring to the University of Tsukuba Hospital for proton beam therapy (PBT) during intensive chemotherapy in children with Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) who had been diagnosed and started their first-line treatment at prefectural or regional centers for pediatric oncology.
backgroundThe treatment of ESFT relies on a multidisciplinary approach using intensive neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies with surgery and radiotherapy. Multi-agent chemotherapy comprising vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide (VDC-IE) is widely used for ESFT, and the interval between each course is very important for maintaining the intensity and effect of chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsClinical information of patients who received PBT and VDC-IE between April 2009 and May 2016 was collected retrospectively. The intervals between each course of VDC-IE and adverse events were assessed.
resultsFifteen patients were evaluated. No delays in the intervals of chemotherapy due to transfer were observed. There were no adverse events caused during/just after transfer and no increases in adverse events. The estimated 4-year overall and event-free survival rates were 94.6% and 84.8%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Although the results of efficacy are preliminary, survival rates were comparable with past studies. More experience and follow-up are required to further assess the efficacy of PBT for patients with ESFT.
conclusionMultidisciplinary therapy for children with ESFT involving transfer to our hospital for PBT during VDC-IE was feasible without treatment delay or an increase in adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.