Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197526›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2018

Trough concentration of itraconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jingru Zhang, Yiwei Liu, Xiaolu Nie, Yuncui Yu, Jian Gu, Libo Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current infectious disease management challenges in inborn errors of immunity.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. High incidence of invasive fungal infection during acute myeloid leukemia treatment in a resource-limited country: clinical risk factors and treatment outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingru ZhangClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, lb.zhao@163.com.
Yiwei LiuClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, lb.zhao@163.com.
Xiaolu NieClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, lb.zhao@163.com.
Yuncui YuClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, lb.zhao@163.com.
Jian GuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Libo ZhaoClinical Research Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, lb.zhao@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe optimum trough concentration of itraconazole for clinical response and safty is controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the optimum trough concentration of itraconazole and evaluate its relationship with efficacy and safety.

methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Clinical-Trials.gov, and three Chinese literature databases (CNKI, WanFang, and CBM). We included observational studies that compared clinical outcomes below or above the trough concentration cut-off value which we set as 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/L. The efficacy outcomes were rate of successful treatment, rate of prophylaxis failure and invasive fungal infection (IFI)-related mortality. The safety outcomes included incidents of hepatotoxicity and other adverse events.

resultsThe study included a total of 29 studies involving 2,346 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that compared with itraconazole trough concentrations (C

conclusionAn itraconazole trough concentration of 0.25 mg/L should be considered as the lower threshold for prophylaxis, and a target concentration of 0.5 mg/L should be the lower limit for effective treatment. A trough level of 1.0 mg/L is associated with increased hepatotoxicity and other adverse events (using High Performance Liquid Chromatography [HPLC]).

Indexed as

efficacyitraconazolemeta-analysissafetytrough concentration

Identifiers

PMID30197526
PMCPMC6112779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.