ArticleInfection and drug resistance2018
Application of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and their antibiotic resistance profile in Zagazig University intensive care units.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- 16 S rRNA-based molecular identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species in neonates with sepsis and their antibiotic resistance patterns in Ahvaz, Iran.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- The synergy ofThe Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Coagulase-negative staphylococci in outpatient routines: the implications of switching from CLSI to BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Article
- Antibiotic Resistance andInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Carriage ofJournal of veterinary science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCoagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are normal inhabitants of human skin and mucous membranes. However, CoNS represent one of the major nosocomial pathogens, especially in immunocompromised patients. The increasing incidence of CoNS and mainly methicillin-resistant strains underlines the need for an accurate identification of Staphylococcus isolates at the species level. Analysis of the
methodsA total of 200 staphylococci isolates were collected from various clinical samples. Phenotyping methods were used for initial identification followed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of
resultsIn the present study, 125 isolates were identified as CoNS; among them,
conclusionOur results confirmed the predominance of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.