Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197475›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2018

From bench to bedside: Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical setting.

Maria Gloria Mumolo, Lorenzo Bertani, Linda Ceccarelli, Gabriella Laino, Giorgia Di Fluri, Eleonora Albano, Gherardo Tapete, Francesco Costa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03808506 (Relationship Between Baseline Burden of Disease and Anti-TNF Drug Trough Levels in Ulcerative Colitis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03808506 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Relationship Between Baseline Burden of Disease and Anti-TNF Drug Trough Levels in Ulcerative Colitis.

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2019 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsFecal calprotectin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New Interleukin-23 Antagonists' Use in Crohn's Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Gloria MumoloDepartment of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa 56124, Italy.
Lorenzo BertaniDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56122, Italy.
Linda CeccarelliDepartment of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa 56124, Italy.
Gabriella LainoDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56122, Italy.
Giorgia Di FluriDepartment of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa 56124, Italy.
Eleonora AlbanoDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56122, Italy.
Gherardo TapeteDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56122, Italy.
Francesco CostaDepartment of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa 56124, Italy. fcosta@med.unipi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal calprotectin (FC) has emerged as one of the most useful tools for clinical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Many different methods of assessment have been developed and different cut-offs have been suggested for different clinical settings. We carried out a comprehensive literature review of the most relevant FC-related topics: the role of FC in discriminating between IBD and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and its use in managing IBD patients In patients with intestinal symptoms, due to the high negative predictive value a normal FC level reliably rules out active IBD. In IBD patients a correlation with both mucosal healing and histology was found, and there is increasing evidence that FC assessment can be helpful in monitoring disease activity and response to therapy as well as in predicting relapse, post-operative recurrence or pouchitis. Recently, its use in the context of a treat-to-target approach led to a better outcome than clinically-based therapy adjustment in patients with early Crohn's disease. In conclusion, FC measurement represents a cheap, safe and reliable test, easy to perform and with a good reproducibility. The main concerns are still related to the choice of the optimal cut-off, both for differentiating IBD from IBS, and for the management of IBD patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeColonColonoscopyCrohn DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialFecesGastrointestinal AgentsHumansIntestinal MucosaIrritable Bowel SyndromeLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersGastrointestinal AgentsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexCrohn’s diseaseFecal calprotectinInflammatory bowel diseasesIrritable bowel syndromeUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID30197475
PMCPMC6127662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.