ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018
Ultrasound Segmentation of Rat Hearts Using Convolution Neural Networks.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Driven Contouring of High-Frequency Four-Dimensional Cardiac Ultrasound Data.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Fully automated segmentation of the right ventricle in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot using U-Net.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound is widely used for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. However, estimates such as left ventricle volume currently require manual segmentation, which can be time consuming. In addition, cardiac ultrasound is often complicated by imaging artifacts such as shadowing and mirror images, making it difficult for simple intensity-based automated segmentation methods. In this work, we use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to segment ultrasound images of rat hearts embedded in agar phantoms into four classes: background, myocardium, left ventricle cavity, and right ventricle cavity. We also explore how the inclusion of a single diseased heart changes the results in a small dataset. We found an average overall segmentation accuracy of 70.0% ± 7.3% when combining the healthy and diseased data, compared to 72.4% ± 6.6% for just the healthy hearts. This work suggests that including diseased hearts with healthy hearts in training data could improve segmentation results, while testing a diseased heart with a model trained on healthy hearts can produce accurate segmentation results for some classes but not others. More data are needed in order to improve the accuracy of the CNN based segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.