Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197095›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2018

Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience.

L E Henke, J A Contreras, O L Green, B Cai, H Kim, M C Roach, J R Olsen, B Fischer-Valuck, D F Mullen, R Kashani and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04570943 (Phase II Study to Assess the Interest of a Sequential Treatment With Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04570943 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study to Assess the Interest of a Sequential Treatment With Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel (GEMBRAX) and Then FOLFIRINOX Followed by Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2021 to 2030Enrolled103ConditionsLocally Advanced Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaArmsGabrinox, MRI-GUIDED STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bringing online adaptive radiotherapy to a standard C-arm linac.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

L E HenkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J A ContrerasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
O L GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
B CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
H KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
M C RoachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J R OlsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
B Fischer-ValuckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
D F MullenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R KashaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
M A ThomasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
I ZoberiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
D YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
V RodriguezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J D BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
C G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
P ParikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
S MuticDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J MichalskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: jmichalski@wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMagnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) has been clinically implemented since 2014. This technology offers improved soft-tissue visualisation, daily imaging, and intra-fraction real-time imaging without added radiation exposure, and the opportunity for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) to adjust for anatomical changes. Here we share the longest single-institution experience with MRIgRT, focusing on trends and changes in use over the past 4.5 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analysed clinical information, including patient demographics, treatment dates, disease sites, dose/fractionation, and clinical trial enrolment for all patients treated at our institution using MRIgRT on a commercially available, integrated 0.35 T MRI, tri-cobalt-60 device from 2014 to 2018. For each patient, factors including disease site, clinical rationale for MRIgRT use, use of ART, and proportion of fractions adapted were summated and compared between individual years of use (2014-2018) to identify shifts in institutional practice patterns.

resultsSix hundred and forty-two patients were treated with 666 unique treatment courses using MRIgRT at our institution between 2014 and 2018. Breast cancer was the most common disease, with use of cine MRI gating being a particularly important indication, followed by abdominal sites, where the need for cine gating and use of ART drove MRIgRT use. One hundred and ninety patients were treated using ART in 1550 fractions, 67.6% (1050) of which were adapted. ART was primarily used in cancers of the abdomen. Over time, breast and gastrointestinal cancers became increasingly dominant for MRIgRT use, hypofractionated treatment courses became more popular, and gastrointestinal cancers became the principal focus of ART. DISCUSSION: MRIgRT is widely applicable within the field of radiation oncology and new clinical uses continue to emerge. At our institution to date, applications such as ART for gastrointestinal cancers and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for breast cancer have become dominant indications, although this is likely to continue to evolve.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedARTMRIgRTMRI-guided radiation therapyonline-adaptive radiation therapySMART

Identifiers

PMID30197095
PMCPMC6177300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.