Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30197068›Full record

ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

Consultation for Elevated Blood Eosinophils: Clinical Presentations, High Value Diagnostic Tests, and Treatment Options.

Paneez Khoury, Bruce S Bochner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06265870 (Comparison of Outcome Between Specific Anthelminthic Treatment According to Test Results and Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilic Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06265870 narecruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Outcome Between Specific Anthelminthic Treatment According to Test Results and Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilic Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince of Songkla UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled700ConditionsEosinophiliaArmsAlbendazole, Ivermectin or albendazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biologics and Hypereosinophilic Syndromes: Knowledge Gaps and Controversies.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Article
  5. HES and EGPA: Two Sides of the Same Coin.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Differential diagnosis of hypereosinophilia].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019
    Review
  15. Pediatric Hypereosinophilia: Characteristics, Clinical Manifestations, and Diagnoses.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paneez KhouryLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Bruce S BochnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: bruce.bochner@northwestern.edu.
National Institutes of Health · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Treating lung inflammation by targeting SiglecsP01HL107151 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNAAR, RONALD L · 2011 to 2017
$15.4M
Using siglecs and their ligands to treat allergic diseases SALTADU19AI136443 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SCHNAAR, RONALD L · 2018 to 2022
$7.6M
Targeting Siglec-8/Siglec-F Reduce Allergic Responses In Vitro and In VivoR01AI072265 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
Targeting Siglec-8/-F to treat eosinophil and mast cell related disordersR56AI072265 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2012 to 2012
$405k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL107151NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072265NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI072265NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI136443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The workup of a patient found to have eosinophilia should follow a thorough path with a detailed history and physical examination aimed at eliciting eosinophilic organ involvement, followed by histological confirmation whenever possible. The differential diagnosis of hypereosinophilia is extensive, but a rational approach beyond the history and physical examination including serologic, blood, and bone marrow cell analyses, genetic testing, and radiologic imaging can distinguish many of the causes. Often input from specialists (eg, hematology, dermatology, pulmonary, gastroenterology, and neurology) can help narrow down the possibilities and eventually result in a specific diagnosis. An accurate diagnosis is key to choosing the optimal treatment for a particular condition, and this is certainly true for eosinophilic disorders. Myeloid neoplasms that present with eosinophilia, for example, may respond to medicines that the allergist may be less accustomed to using, such as immunosuppressive agents and kinase inhibitors. Similarly, newly approved biologics that target IL-5 and eosinophils may provide new options for management. What follows is a case-based approach that helps to underscore key features of diagnosis, management, and follow-up when faced with a patient with a potential eosinophil-related disorder.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBlood CellsBone MarrowDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEosinophiliaEosinophilsHematologic NeoplasmsHumansHypereosinophilic SyndromeImmunosuppression TherapyInterleukin-5Biological ProductsInterleukin-5DiagnosisEosinophiliaHypereosinophilic syndromesTestingTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30197068
PMCPMC6258010
OpenAlexW2892081865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.