ArticleGynecologic oncology2018
Tumor-specific outcome of metachronous uterine malignancy after pelvic irradiation for cervical cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of secondary uterine malignancy following radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a study based on the SEER database.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Risk of Secondary Malignancies After Pelvic Radiation: A Population-based Analysis.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Prognostic Model for Predicting Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival Among Patients With Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A SEER Based Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine survival of women who develop metachronous uterine malignancy after definitive pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
methodsThis retrospective observational study examined the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results Program between 1973 and 2013. Women with cervical cancer who received definitive radiotherapy without hysterectomy were examined for the diagnosis of metachronous uterine malignancy (n = 5277). Survival was compared between metachronous and non-metachronous uterine malignancies according to tumor factors.
resultsThe 10- and 20-year cumulative incidences of metachronous uterine malignancy were 0.6% and 1.2%, respectively. When compared to non-metachronous uterine malignancy, metachronous tumor were more likely to be non-endometrioid and advanced-stage (both, P < 0.001). As a whole cohort, metachronous uterine malignancy was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (OS) compared to non-metachronous tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 4.22, P < 0.001). OS was significantly worse in metachronous compared to non-metachronous malignancies, although the magnitude of statistical significance was greater for endometrioid tumors (HRs for endometrioid versus non-endometrioid: 6.17 versus 1.92). For grade 1-2 endometrial cancer, metachronous cases had significantly decreased OS compared to non-metachronous cases, a larger difference than that seen in higher grade tumors (HRs for grade 1-2 versus 3: 7.79 versus 2.15). Similarly, in early-stage endometrial cancer, metachronous cases had significantly decreased OS, with a greater HR compared to advanced-stage disease (HRs for stage I-II versus III-IV: 5.29 versus 2.29).
conclusionRadiotherapy-associated metachronous uterine malignancy after cervical cancer is rare but commonly presents with aggressive tumor characteristics. The impact on survival is considerably high when metachronous uterine malignancy is endometrioid, low-grade, and early-stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.