Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30196942›Full record

ReviewFertility and sterility2018

Caffeine, alcohol, smoking, and reproductive outcomes among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments.

Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Jorge E Chavarro, Audrey J Gaskins

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fertility and sterility, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The most appropriate indicators of successful ovarian stimulation.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidia Mínguez-AlarcónDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jorge E ChavarroDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: agaskins@hsph.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI JAIME ELIZABETH HART · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Transgenic CoreP30DK046200 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CORKEY, BARBARA E. · 1992 to 2021
$25.0M
PCBs, Phthalates and Male Reproductive HealthR01ES009718 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HAUSER, RUSS B · 1999 to 2018
$11.6M
Exposure to phthalates and OP flame retardants and long-term maternal cardiovascular and metabolic healthR01ES033651 · NIEHS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BRENDA M BIRMANN, Lidia Minguez Alarcon · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
Maternal and Paternal Flame Retardant Exposure, Impact on Fertility and PregnancyR01ES022955 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HAUSER, RUSS B, MEEKER, JOHN D. · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Male pesticide exposure, reproductive health and epigeneticsR01ES034700 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Lidia Minguez Alarcon · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesK99ES026648 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2017 to 2018
$246k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK046200NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES026648NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009718NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022955NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES033651NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES034700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decade, as the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has continued to increase worldwide, research investigating whether modifiable lifestyle factors, such as alcohol, caffeine, and smoking, may affect ART outcomes has grown. Despite the vast literature, there is still uncertainty regarding the effects of some of these exposures on ART outcomes. The objective of this review is to summarize the epidemiologic literature on intakes of caffeine and alcohol, smoking, and reproductive outcomes among women undergoing ART. Of the five epidemiologic studies on caffeine intake and ART outcomes, only one found a significant negative effect of caffeine intake on live birth following ART. There have been six epidemiologic studies exploring whether alcohol intake is associated with fertility outcomes among women undergoing ART. Three studies assessed current alcohol consumption and observed a negative effect on outcomes such as fertilization, embryo quality, and implantation. When alcohol intake in the year before treatment was assessed, no relationships were observed with clinical outcomes following ART. Finally, numerous epidemiologic studies and a handful of meta-analyses have confirmed that female current smokers have worse ART outcomes compared with nonsmokers. Although former smokers tend to have better ART outcomes than current smokers, very few individual studies have investigated the influence of smoking cessation on ART outcomes. Literature on male smoking, drinking, and caffeine habits in relation to ART outcomes is even sparser and inconsistent, making it difficult to draw strong conclusions on that topic. In summary, there is little evidence supporting a detrimental effect of moderate caffeine intake on ART outcomes. Current consumption of alcohol may have a negative effect on ART outcomes, but at present the evidence is limited. Women who currently smoke cigarettes have been consistently found to have poorer ART outcomes, including reduced live birth rates, but a quantification of the benefits of smoking cessation is lacking.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedAlcohol DrinkingCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTobacco SmokingCaffeineCentral Nervous System Stimulantsalcoholassisted reproductionCaffeinefertilitysmoking

Identifiers

PMID30196942
PMCPMC11002791
OpenAlexW2890438936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.