Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30196652›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2018

Review of the UBC Porcine Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Kyoung-Tae Kim, Femke Streijger, Neda Manouchehri, Kitty So, Katelyn Shortt, Elena B Okon, Seth Tigchelaar, Peter Cripton, Brian K Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delayed atorvastatin delivery promotes recovery after experimental spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyoung-Tae KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Femke StreijgerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Neda ManouchehriInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kitty SoInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Katelyn ShorttInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Elena B OkonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Seth TigchelaarInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter CriptonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brian K KwonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation of Korea 2015R1C1A1A01056299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) research has recently focused on the use of rat and mouse models for in vivo SCI experiments. Such small rodent SCI models are invaluable for the field, and much has been discovered about the biologic and physiologic aspects of SCI from these models. It has been difficult, however, to reproduce the efficacy of treatments found to produce neurologic benefits in rodent SCI models when these treatments are tested in human clinical trials. A large animal model may have advantages for translational research where anatomical, physiological, or genetic similarities to humans may be more relevant for pre-clinically evaluating novel therapies. Here, we review the work carried out at the University of British Columbia (UBC) on a large animal model of SCI that utilizes Yucatan miniature pigs. The UBC porcine model of SCI may be a useful intermediary in the pre-clinical testing of novel pharmacological treatments, cell-based therapies, and the "bedside back to bench" translation of human clinical observations, which require preclinical testing in an applicable animal model.

Indexed as

Porcine modelPreclinical testingSpinal cord injuriesTranslational medical research

Identifiers

PMID30196652
PMCPMC6129752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.