Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30196385›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2018

Platelet-rich plasma and the shoulder: clinical indications and outcomes.

Andrew Schneider, Rebecca Burr, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05161468 (Bayesian Non-inferiority Trial of Injection Therapies for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05161468 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Bayesian Non-inferiority Trial of Injection Therapies for Acromioclavicular Joint Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrooke Army Medical CenterRan2021 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsAcromioclavicular SprainArmsLidocaine injection, Corticosteroid Injection, Protein Rich Plasma(PRP) Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Efficacy comparison of sodium hyaluronate, corticosteroids, and autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew SchneiderDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, 2160 South 1St Ave., Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Rebecca BurrDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, 2160 South 1St Ave., Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Nickolas GarbisDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, 2160 South 1St Ave., Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Dane SalazarDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, 2160 South 1St Ave., Maywood, IL, 60153, USA. dsalazar@lumc.edu.
Loyola Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe orthopedic community has seen a rapid rise in the clinical use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the management of shoulder pathologies over the past decade. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature regarding the indications and outcomes of PRP for the surgical and non-surgical management of common shoulder pathologies, including rotator cuff tears. RECENT

findingsMultiple studies have been published recently regarding the use of PRP for the operative and non-operative treatment of rotator cuff tears. There has been less research published on the use of PRP in the management of other conditions of the shoulder. Despite attempts to standardize and classify PRP formulations, there remains great variation in the inter- and intra-subjection composition, preparation, and administration techniques of PRP, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the utility and effectiveness of this biologic treatment as reported by Mazzocca et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94(4):308-16, 2012). Recent literature has shown equivocal to minor benefit of PRP use for shoulder pain, function, and healing. While few complications have been reported and PRP administration appears to carry little risk to the patient, the body of literature is currently inconclusive regarding the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of PRP in the treatment of shoulder pathology. As for PRP use specifically as an adjunct to surgical rotator cuff repairs, there is no clear consensus on its effectiveness in either clinical or structural outcomes. To further delineate the efficacy of PRP for shoulder pathology, it is essential that more double-blinded, randomized controlled investigations with large sample sizes and standardized PRP preparations be performed.

Indexed as

Biologic augmentationPlatelet-rich plasmaPRPRegenerative medicineRotator cuff tearShoulder

Identifiers

PMID30196385
PMCPMC6220008
OpenAlexW2890453700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.