ArticleAudiology & neuro-otology2018
Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.
Article in Audiology & neuro-otology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Powering the Gracilis for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Based on Donor Nerve.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Comprehensive analysis of predictors and outcomes following Vibrant Soundbridge implantation - part 1 of a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Article
- Effect of active middle ear implant on auditory speech perception in individuals with ear malformation.CoDAS · 2025Observational
- Article
- Factors to Describe the Outcome Characteristics of a CI Recipient.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Long-term outcomes of retrospective case series of middle ear implantation with Vibrant Soundbridge in children with congenital aural atresia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Potentially Inadequate Real-Life Speech Levels by Healthcare Professionals during Communication with Older Inpatients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Observational
- A Novel Representation of Audiological and Subjective Findings for Acoustical, Bone Conduction and Direct Drive Hearing Solutions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Age-Related Decline of Speech Perception.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Review
- Speech Perception in Bilateral Hearing Aid Users With Different Grades of Asymmetric Hearing Loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Sound-localisation performance in patients with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia fitted with an active middle ear implant.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- [Pitfalls in the statistical world].HNO · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently no standardized method for reporting audiological, surgical and subjective outcome measures in clinical trials with active middle ear implants (AMEIs). It is often difficult to compare studies due to data incompatibility and to perform meta-analyses across different centres is almost impossible. A committee of ENT and audiological experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland decided to address this issue by developing new minimal standards for reporting the outcomes of AMEI clinical trials. The consensus presented here aims to provide a recommendation to enable better inter-study comparability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.