Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30196187›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2018

Femoral entheseal shape and attachment angle as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Callan M Luetkemeyer, Benjamin C Marchi, James A Ashton-Miller, Ellen M Arruda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anatomical Tissue Engineering of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Entheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. An Anterior Cruciate Ligament Failure Mechanism.The American journal of sports medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Callan M LuetkemeyerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: cmluetke@umich.edu.
Benjamin C MarchiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA.
James A Ashton-MillerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA.
Ellen M ArrudaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA; Program in Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Dearborn · US

Funding

New Perspectives on ACL InjuryR01AR054821 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ASHTON-MILLER, JAMES ANTHONY, WOJTYS, EDWARD M · 2007 to 2021
$3.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although non-contact human ACL tears are a common knee injury, little is known about why they usually fail near the femoral enthesis. Recent histological studies have identified a range of characteristic femoral enthesis tidemark profiles and ligament attachment angles. We tested the effect of the tidemark profile and attachment angle on the distribution of strain across the enthesis, under a ligament stretch of 1.1. We employed a 2D analytical model followed by 3D finite element models using three constitutive forms and solved with ABAQUS/Standard. The results show that the maximum equivalent strain was located in the most distal region of the ACL femoral enthesis. It is noteworthy that this strain was markedly increased by a concave (with respect to bone) entheseal profile in that region as well as by a smaller attachment angle, both of which are features more commonly found in females. Although the magnitude of the maximum equivalent strain predicted was not consistent among the constitutive models used, it did not affect the relationship observed between entheseal shape and maximum equivalent strain. We conclude that a concave tidemark profile and acute attachment angle at the femoral ACL enthesis increase the risk for ACL failure, and that failure is most likely to begin in the most distal region of that enthesis.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesFemurFinite Element AnalysisMechanical PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaRisk FactorsStress, MechanicalACLAttachment angleEnthesisInjuryMechanicsRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID30196187
PMCPMC6417098
OpenAlexW2888867158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.