ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2019
Are Risk Factors for Growth of Choroidal Nevi Associated With Malignant Transformation? Assessment With a Validated Genomic Biomarker.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metastatic potential of small posterior uveal melanomas.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Oncology: Differentiating Choroidal Melanocytic Lesions.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Swept-Source OCT Angiography Features of Melanotic Choroidal Tumors: An Analysis of 102 Consecutive Cases.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Early genetic evolution of driver mutations in uveal melanoma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Small Choroidal Melanoma: Diagnosis, Treatment Outcomes, and Unending Controversy.Seminars in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Assessing the Clinical Utility of Multimodal Large Language Models in the Diagnosis and Management of Pigmented Choroidal Lesions.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Challenges for Opticians in Evaluating Small Pigmented Choroidal Lesions: Potential Support From the MelAInoma Deep Learning Algorithm.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Colour fusion effect on deep learning classification of uveal melanoma.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Uveal Melanoma: Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Advances in multimodal imaging for diagnosis of pigmented ocular fundus lesions.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2024Review
- Choroidal Nevus Features Associated with Subspecialty Referral.Ophthalmology. Retina · 2023Article
- Cross-Platform Identification and Validation of Uveal Melanoma Vitreous Protein Biomarkers.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Choroidal Melanoma: A Mini Review.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Prediction Model to Discriminate Small Choroidal Melanoma from Choroidal Nevus.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2022Article
- Small Choroidal Melanoma: Correlation of Growth Rate with Pathology.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Small Choroidal Melanoma: Correlation between Clinical Characteristics and Metastatic Potential.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- A Word of Caution regarding Risk Factors for Malignant Transformation of Choroidal Nevi.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Decreased Retinal Sensitivity Overlying Choroidal Nevi.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- What's in a Name? Large Choroidal Nevus, Small Choroidal Melanoma, or Indeterminate Melanocytic Tumor.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Distinguishing Choroidal Nevi from Melanomas Using the MOLES Algorithm: Evaluation in an Ocular Nevus Clinic.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo test the hypothesis that widely used clinical risk factors for growth of choroidal nevi are associated with malignant transformation.
methodsFine needle biopsy for assignment of gene expression profile (class 1 or class 2) was performed in 207 choroidal melanocytic tumors < 3.5 mm in thickness. The class 2 profile was employed as a validated biomarker for malignant transformation. The following data were collected: patient age and sex, tumor diameter and thickness, distance of posterior tumor margin from the optic disc, and the presence or absence of serous retinal detachment, orange lipofuscin pigment, drusen, retinal pigment epithelial fibrosis, retinal pigment epithelial atrophy, visual symptoms, and documented tumor growth.
resultsClinical features associated with the class 2 profile included patient age > 60 years and tumor thickness > 2.25 mm (Fisher exact test, P = .002 for both). Documented growth was not associated with the class 2 profile (P = .5). The odds ratio of a tumor having the class 2 profile was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.3-5.9) for patient age > 60 years and 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.4-8.8) for tumor thickness > 2.25 mm. For patients with both risk factors, the "number needed to treat" to identify 1 patient with a class 2 tumor was 4.3 (P = .0002). No other clinical feature or combination of features was associated with the class 2 profile.
conclusionsNone of the widely used choroidal nevus risk factors for tumor growth, nor documented growth itself, is pathognomonic of malignant transformation as defined by class 2 gene expression profile. Patient age and tumor thickness may be helpful for identifying small choroidal melanocytic tumors that are more likely to have the class 2 profile. Observation for growth prior to treatment continues to be reasonable for most patients with suspicious choroidal nevi. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.