Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30195415›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2019

Convolutional Neural Networks with Template-Based Data Augmentation for Functional Lung Image Quantification.

Nicholas J Tustison, Brian B Avants, Zixuan Lin, Xue Feng, Nicholas Cullen, Jaime F Mata, Lucia Flors, James C Gee, Talissa A Altes, John P Mugler Iii and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lung Volume Dependence and Repeatability of HyperpolarizedRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging gravity-induced lung water redistribution with automated inline processing at 0.55 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas J TustisonDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: ntustison@virginia.edu.
Brian B AvantsCingulate, Hampton, New Hampshire.
Zixuan LinDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Xue FengDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Nicholas CullenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jaime F MataDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Lucia FlorsDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
James C GeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Talissa A AltesDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
John P Mugler IiiDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Kun QingDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI: a new multi-dimensional biomarker to determine pulmonary physiologic responses to COPD therapeuticsR01HL132177 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI QING, KUN, SHIM, YUN MICHAEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Scale Up of Hyperpolarized Xe ProductionR44HL087550 · NHLBI · XEMED, LLC · PI RUSET, IULIAN CONSTANTIN · 2008 to 2013
$3.7M
Simultaneous Xe129 MRI of Regional Lung Ventilation and Gas Uptake in COPDR01HL109618 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ALTES, TALISSA A, MUGLER, JOHN P · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
ITK-Lung: A Software Framework for Lung Image Processing and AnalysisR01HL133889 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Xe129 MRI of the Lung: A New Technology to Assess Treatment for COPDR21HL129112 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI QING, KUN · 2015 to 2016
$435k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109618NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132177NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133889NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL129112NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL087550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesWe propose an automated segmentation pipeline based on deep learning for proton lung MRI segmentation and ventilation-based quantification which improves on our previously reported methodologies in terms of computational efficiency while demonstrating accuracy and robustness. The large data requirement for the proposed framework is made possible by a novel template-based data augmentation strategy. Supporting this work is the open-source ANTsRNet-a growing repository of well-known deep learning architectures first introduced here. MATERIALS AND

methodsDeep convolutional neural network (CNN) models were constructed and trained using a custom multilabel Dice metric loss function and a novel template-based data augmentation strategy. Training (including template generation and data augmentation) employed 205 proton MR images and 73 functional lung MRI. Evaluation was performed using data sets of size 63 and 40 images, respectively.

resultsAccuracy for CNN-based proton lung MRI segmentation (in terms of Dice overlap) was left lung: 0.93 ± 0.03, right lung: 0.94 ± 0.02, and whole lung: 0.94 ± 0.02. Although slightly less accurate than our previously reported joint label fusion approach (left lung: 0.95 ± 0.02, right lung: 0.96 ± 0.01, and whole lung: 0.96 ± 0.01), processing time is <1 second per subject for the proposed approach versus ∼30 minutes per subject using joint label fusion. Accuracy for quantifying ventilation defects was determined based on a consensus labeling where average accuracy (Dice multilabel overlap of ventilation defect regions plus normal region) was 0.94 for the CNN method; 0.92 for our previously reported method; and 0.90, 0.92, and 0.94 for expert readers.

conclusionThe proposed framework yields accurate automated quantification in near real time. CNNs drastically reduce processing time after offline model construction and demonstrate significant future potential for facilitating quantitative analysis of functional lung MRI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicHumansLungProtonsPulmonary VentilationProtonsAdvanced Normalization ToolsANTsRNetHyperpolarized gas imagingNeural networksProton lung MRIU-net

Identifiers

PMID30195415
PMCPMC6397788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.