Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194771›Full record

ReviewSpecial care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry2018

Applications of sensory and physiological measurement in oral-facial dental pain.

Darya Dabiri, Daniel E Harper, Yvonne Kapila, Grant H Kruger, Daniel J Clauw, Steven Harte

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Applications of sensory and physiological measurement in oral-facial dental pain.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darya DabiriChronic Pain & Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-4558
Daniel E HarperChronic Pain & Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yvonne KapilaDivision of Periodontology, Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Grant H KrugerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniel J ClauwChronic Pain & Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Steven HarteChronic Pain & Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

University of Michigan's TMJD and Orofacial Pain Interdisciplinary ConsortiumK12DE023574 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLAUW, DANIEL J, KAPILA, SUNIL D · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE023574NIDCR NIH HHS K12 DE023574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentists regularly employ a variety of self-report and sensory techniques to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of tooth-related disease. Many of these techniques leverage principles borrowed from psychophysics, the quantitative measurement of the relationship between stimuli and evoked sensations, which falls under the larger umbrella of quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, most clinicians fail to meet the bar for what could be considered quantitative sensory testing, and instead focus on qualitative and dichotomous "yes/no" aspects of sensory experience. With our current subjective measurements for pain assessments, diagnosis and treatment of dental pain in young children and individuals (any age) with severe cognitive impairment rely extensively on third-party observations. Consequently, the limitation of inadequate pain diagnosis can lead to poor pain management. In this review, it discusses mechanisms that underlie acute and chronic dental pain. It details the measurement of somatosensory responses and pulpal blood flow as objective measures of tooth health and pain. It proposes that bridging these varied methodologies will significantly improve diagnosis and treatment of orofacial pain and pathology. It concludes that improving the precision of sensory measurements could yield important improvements in diagnostic challenges in pulpal pathology for noncommunicative and cognitively impaired individuals.

Indexed as

Dental Care for Chronically IllDental Care for Persons with DisabilitiesFacial PainHumansPain MeasurementPsychophysicscognitive impairmentdental painorafacial painquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID30194771
PMCPMC6282998
OpenAlexW2891522958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.