Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194620›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2018

Inappropriate Prescribing in Elderly Inpatients at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Nisreen Abdulrahman Jastaniah, Ahmed Saeed Almaqati, Anas Khaleel Alsuraihi, Sultan Adnan Abughanim, Mohammed Aseeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Potentially inappropriate medications use and its association with health-related quality of life among elderly cardiac patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nisreen Abdulrahman JastaniahKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Family Medicine, Geriatric and Palliative Care, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Saeed AlmaqatiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Anas Khaleel AlsuraihiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Anas.k.s@hotmail.com.
Sultan Adnan AbughanimKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AseeriKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center/King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesElderly populations usually use more medications than any other age group and are therefore more susceptible to potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), drug-drug interactions, and the related health consequences. In this study, we aimed to determine PIP prevalence and explore the most common potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed.

methodsThis was a retrospective study involving elderly patients admitted at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah (KAMC-JD), between November 2014 and January 2015. We included all elderly patients aged 60 years and above admitted to KAMC-JD through the emergency department (ED), clinic, and direct admissions during the study period. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit, oncology department, and/or those who passed way in the ED before admission were excluded from the study. Prescriptions were assessed for PIP using the 2012 Beers Criteria, which categorizes PIMs to three classes: first class are medications to avoid in older adults regardless of their conditions; second class are medications to avoid with certain diseases or syndromes; and third class are medications that should be used with caution.

resultsOur study included 135 patients, of which 49.6% were males. The mean age was 71.26 ± 8.1 years. According to the 2012 Beers Criteria, 80% of patients were using at least one listed PIM. For the Criteria's first, second, and third classes, PIM prescription rates were 72.6%, 59.2%, and 37.7%, respectively. Regarding the most prescribed PIM in each class, insulin (sliding scale) was the most reported PIM in the first class, NSAIDs in the second class, and, lastly, vasodilators in the third class.

conclusionPIP is a serious health issue threatening elderly patients. There is a need to develop evidence-based, context-sensitive, and user-friendly tools to assess PIP, as well as supportive training programs.

Identifiers

PMID30194620
PMCPMC6265234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.