Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194553›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2019

Clinical effectiveness of multi-wavelength photobiomodulation therapy as an adjunct to extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Mary Kamal Nassif Takla, Soheir Shethata Rezk-Allah Rezk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06305507 (Effects of Differents Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06305507 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Differents Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SevilleRan2024 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsFasciitis, PlantarArmsStatic therapy, Static Mode
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. A Narrative Review of Shockwave Therapy in Plantar Fasciitis.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary Kamal Nassif TaklaDepartment of Basic Science for Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. marynassif@pt.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-4665
Soheir Shethata Rezk-Allah RezkDepartment of Basic Science for Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of our study was to investigate the cumulative effect of combining medium-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), as well as to compare between their relative effectiveness in the management of plantar fasciitis (PF). One hundred twenty participants with chronic PF, more than 6 months with failure to respond to conservative treatment, were randomly assigned into four equal groups. Participants received either ESWT with PBMT, ESWT (once a week), PBMT (three times a week), or sham-PBMT (three times a week) for three consecutive weeks. A home exercise program was also included for all four groups. Outcome measures included pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional foot index disability subscale (FFI-d) that were collected prior to the first treatment session and at the end of the 3-week treatment period, as well as at a follow-up session, 12 weeks after the final treatment session. There were statistically significant improvements in post-intervention and follow-up PPT, VAS, and FFI-d values in all treatment groups (P < 0.0001). As for the sham-PBMT, no significant difference was found between the pre-, post-intervention and follow-up values (P > 0.05). Bonferroni correction test revealed that there was a significant difference between all the four groups in PPT, VAS, and FFI-d values (P < 0.0001). All active treatment groups maintained the treatment effect at the 12-week follow-up. Both ESWT and PBMT were effective in increasing PPT values, decreasing pain and increasing functional ability. Additionally, application of PBMT after ESWT was shown to be superior over ESWT and PBMT alone, and ESWT was superior over PBMT in terms of reducing pain sensitivity and increasing function.Level of Evidence II.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyLow-Level Light TherapyDisability EvaluationFasciitis, PlantarFemaleFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPain ThresholdTreatment OutcomeVisual Analog ScaleExtracorporeal shock wave therapyPhotobiomodulation therapyPlantar fasciitis

Identifiers

PMID30194553
OpenAlexW2889813425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.