Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194516›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2019

Loop diuretics in chronic heart failure: how to manage congestion?

Justas Simonavičius, Christian Knackstedt, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Diuretics in Cardiovascular Disease: For How Long and at What Dose?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justas SimonavičiusClinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. j.simonavicius@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-4404
Christian KnackstedtDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hans-Peter Brunner-La RoccaDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop diuretics remain the cornerstone of congestion management in contemporary chronic heart failure care. However, their use is not supported by high quality data, and there is doubt about the safety in the outpatient heart failure setting. Still, congestion is related to a worse outcome, and there is general consensus among experts that congestion should not be tolerated in heart failure patients. Recommendations in international guidelines, regarding decongestion strategies in chronic heart failure, are limited. Thus, there is an emerging need for clinical decision-making support about the best strategy for using loop diuretics and decongestion in the chronic setting. The present review provides a comprehensive overview over the evidence of chronic loop diuretic use. Strategies for the assessment of congestion in the outpatient setting and decongestion algorithm are provided to assist health care specialists in delivering high-quality heart failure care.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsChronic DiseaseConsensusDisease Models, AnimalHeart FailureHumansHyperemiaMiddle AgedRatsSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsChronic heart failureDecongestionDiuretic resistanceDiuretic therapyLoop diureticVolume overload

Identifiers

PMID30194516
OpenAlexW2890077078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.