Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194498›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018

Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy in Medical Care Settings.

Jesse H Wright, Laura W McCray, Tracy D Eells, Rangaraj Gopalraj, Laura B Bishop

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesse H WrightUniversity of Louisville Depression Center, University of Louisville, 401 East Chestnut Street, Suite 610, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. jwright@iglou.com.
Laura W McCrayUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Tracy D EellsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Rangaraj GopalrajDepartment of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Laura B BishopDepartments of Internal Medicine & Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe reviewed research on computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy (CCBT) performed in medical settings with the goals of assessing the effectiveness of this newer method of treatment delivery, evaluating the need for clinician support of therapeutic computer programs, and making suggestions for future research and clinical implementation. RECENT

findingsThe overall results of randomized, controlled trials suggest that CCBT can be an effective treatment for depression in primary care patients and health care anxiety. Also, it can be a useful component of treatment for somatic conditions including irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain. The amount and type of clinician support needed for maximizing effectiveness remains unclear. CCBT offers promise for overcoming barriers to delivering effective psychotherapy in medical settings. We recommend that next steps for researchers include more definitive studies of the influence of clinician support, investigations focused on implementation in clinical practices, cost-benefit analyses, and use of technological advances.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPrimary Health CareTherapy, Computer-AssistedAnxietyDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeChronic painComputer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapyDepressionDiabetesFibromyalgiaHealth care anxietyIrritable bowel syndromeMedical settings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.