Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194395›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Planar coil-based contact-mode magnetic stimulation: synaptic responses in hippocampal slices and thermal considerations.

Hee-Jin Park, Heekyung Kang, Jihoon Jo, Euiheon Chung, Sohee Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Tone-Arm" Neuromodulation MEMS Microcoil for In Vivo Imaging.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  3. The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hee-Jin ParkSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Heekyung KangDepartment of Biomedical Science and Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Jihoon JoBiomedical Research Institute, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Euiheon ChungSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea. ogong50@gist.ac.kr.
Sohee KimDepartment of Robotics Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea. soheekim@dgist.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-4926-8978

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2016R1A2B4015381National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2017M3A9E2056463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable magnetic stimulation is an emerging type of neuromodulation using coils that are small enough to be implanted in the brain. A major advantage of this method is that stimulation performance could be sustained even though the coil is encapsulated by gliosis due to foreign body reactions. Magnetic fields can induce indirect electric fields and currents in neurons. Compared to transcranial magnetic stimulation, the coil size used in implantable magnetic stimulation can be greatly reduced. However, the size reduction is accompanied by an increase in coil resistance. Hence, the coil could potentially damage neurons from the excess heat generated. Therefore, it is necessary to study the stimulation performance and possible thermal damage by implantable magnetic stimulation. Here, we devised contact-mode magnetic stimulation (CMS), wherein magnetic stimulation was applied to hippocampal slices through a customized planar-type coil underneath the slice in the contact mode. With acute hippocampal slices, we investigated the synaptic responses to examine the field excitatory postsynaptic responses of CMS and the temperature rise during CMS. A long-lasting synaptic depression was exhibited in the CA1 stratum radiatum after CMS, while the temperature remained in a safe range so as not to seriously affect the neural responses.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAnimalsHippocampusMiceSynapsesSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID30194395
PMCPMC6128857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.