Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194305›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy.

Natalie A Steinemann, Redmond G O'Connell, Simon P Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Movement-Independent Signature of Urgency during Human Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Motor Preparation Tracks Decision Boundary Crossing Rather Than Accumulated Evidence in Temporal Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Neurophysiology of Perceptual Decision-Making and Its Alterations in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie A SteinemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA. ns3058@columbia.edu.
Redmond G O'ConnellTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, 2, Ireland.
Simon P KellyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA. simon.kelly@ucd.ie.

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 63829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When decisions are made under speed pressure, "urgency" signals elevate neural activity toward action-triggering thresholds independent of the sensory evidence, thus incurring a cost to choice accuracy. While urgency signals have been observed in brain circuits involved in preparing actions, their influence at other levels of the sensorimotor pathway remains unknown. We used a novel contrast-comparison paradigm to simultaneously trace the dynamics of sensory evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, motor preparation, and muscle activation in humans. Results indicate speed pressure impacts multiple sensorimotor levels but in crucially distinct ways. Evidence-independent urgency was applied to cortical action-preparation signals and downstream muscle activation, but not directly to upstream levels. Instead, differential sensory evidence encoding was enhanced in a way that partially countered the negative impact of motor-level urgency on accuracy, and these opposing sensory-boost and motor-urgency effects had knock-on effects on the buildup and pre-response amplitude of a motor-independent representation of cumulative evidence.

Indexed as

AdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPupilReaction TimeSensorimotor CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30194305
PMCPMC6128824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.