Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194291›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Facultative dosage compensation of developmental genes on autosomes in Drosophila and mouse embryonic stem cells.

Claudia Isabelle Keller Valsecchi, M Felicia Basilicata, Giuseppe Semplicio, Plamen Georgiev, Noel Marie Gutierrez, Asifa Akhtar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. N-terminus ofeLife · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia Isabelle Keller ValsecchiMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-5927
M Felicia BasilicataMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-9459
Giuseppe SemplicioMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.
Plamen GeorgievMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.
Noel Marie GutierrezMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.
Asifa AkhtarMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Stübeweg 51, 79108, Freiburg, Germany. akhtar@ie-freiburg.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-6193
Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CRC1140Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CRC746Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CRC992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haploinsufficiency and aneuploidy are two phenomena, where gene dosage alterations cause severe defects ultimately resulting in developmental failures and disease. One remarkable exception is the X chromosome, where copy number differences between sexes are buffered by dosage compensation systems. In Drosophila, the Male-Specific Lethal complex (MSLc) mediates upregulation of the single male X chromosome. The evolutionary origin and conservation of this process orchestrated by MSL2, the only male-specific protein within the fly MSLc, have remained unclear. Here, we report that MSL2, in addition to regulating the X chromosome, targets autosomal genes involved in patterning and morphogenesis. Precise regulation of these genes by MSL2 is required for proper development. This set of dosage-sensitive genes maintains such regulation during evolution, as MSL2 binds and similarly regulates mouse orthologues via Histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation. We propose that this gene-by-gene dosage compensation mechanism was co-opted during evolution for chromosome-wide regulation of the Drosophila male X.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, DevelopmentalAnimalsBody PatterningCells, CulturedChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCompound Eye, ArthropodDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleLarvaMaleMiceDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsmsl-2 protein, DrosophilaNuclear ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30194291
PMCPMC6128902
OpenAlexW2891321978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.