Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194284›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Multiple functionalities of molecular chaperones revealed through systematic mapping of their interaction networks.

Kamran Rizzolo, Walid A Houry

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Heat Shock Protein 90 as Therapeutic Target for CVDs and Heart Ageing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Mortalin (HSPA9) facilitatesScience signaling · 2020
    Article
  9. Chaperome Networks - Redundancy and Implications for Cancer Treatment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamran RizzoloFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1 and.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-9768
Walid A HouryFrom the Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1M1 and walid.houry@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-3441
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-81256CIHR MOP-93778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chaperones are a highly interactive group of proteins that function globally in many cellular processes involved in maintaining protein homeostasis. Traditional biochemical assays typically do not provide a complete view of the intricate networks through which chaperones collaborate to promote proteostasis. Recent advances in high-throughput systematic analyses of chaperone interactions have uncovered that chaperones display a remarkable cooperativity in their interactions with numerous client proteins. This cooperativity has been found to be a fundamental aspect of a properly functioning cell. Aberrant formation or improper regulation of these interactions can easily lead to disease states. Herein, we provide an overview of the use of large-scale interaction assays, whether physical (protein-protein) or genetic (epistatic), to study chaperone interaction networks. Importantly, we discuss the ongoing need for such studies to determine the mechanisms by which protein homeostasis is controlled in the cell.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsProteostasisAnimalsHumansMolecular ChaperonesMolecular Chaperoneschaperone networksgenetic interaction profilesgenetic interactionsmolecular chaperoneNAJ chaperone complexphysical interactionsprotein assemblyprotein–protein interactionproteomicsproteostasis

Identifiers

PMID30194284
PMCPMC6369283
OpenAlexW2892197574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.